METHODICAL DISCOURSE IN MODERN DISCURSIVE PARADIGM

The article found that the meaning of term “discourse” correlates with a specific research position, which depends on framework relevant scientific field. It is noted distinguish areas language discourse theory speech act, sociolinguistics, ethnography, pragmalinguistics, analysis conversation and variables. history methodology as discipline described. peculiarity technique noted, it not an independent science, but relies data linguistics They made classification methodological identified following types: basis chronological factor approaches to learning from point view object (language, language), teaching methods (direct, conscious, active). Describe periodization in English-speaking environment. In addition, we depending purpose learning, can be divided into three periods: activity, forming competence. Since structuralism dominates first period (late 19th century – early 20th century), this approach views static, “complex multi-level system containing many interconnected interdependent discrete elements”. third development information model interaction topics discourse, requires teacher deep knowledge linguistics, pedagogy, psychology learning.Competence contrasts paradigm knowledge, considers activity student accumulation translation ready-made knowledge. Thus, competence set interrelated qualities individual (knowledge, skills, activity) associated certain objects processes necessary for their related qualitative productive activities. If possession person competence, includes his/her personal attitude him/her subject activity.